Why do you write such a debit with a faded pen?

[Office Partner Information Center] The debts are not so arrogant, I think the main reason is ignorance. Because in the eyes of the debtor, his pen can fade, and when the writing disappears, there is no evidence, and the money he borrows can not be returned. I think that if the debtor knows that the writing of the faded pen can be restored, it will not be so arrogant. It is precisely ignorance that makes this debtor so arrogant and exposes his little tricks.
Here, I feel that I need to popularize the fader pen. The faded pen does make the writing disappear in the air for a certain period of time, but this is not a high-tech. It is actually a very common technology. Because the ink contains phenolphthalein, it will disappear, but the restoration is not complicated. It needs to be reduced with a chemical reagent, that is, an alkaline solution. Therefore, if you encounter such a owe, you still don't want to play tricks. You don't need to worry about it. Save the evidence and don't ruin the loan. Then you can restore it.
The ignorance of the law is also the reason why this debtor is so arrogant. I think that writing a loan with a faded pen is not just about not paying off debts, it has already involved fraud. The legal responsibility for fraud is also much more serious than that of Lao Lai. Regarding the crime of fraud, the criminal law also has provisions:
1. Whoever commits this crime shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or control, and shall be punished with a fine or a single penalty;
2. If the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, it shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years and less, and fined;
3. If the amount is particularly large or has other particularly serious circumstances, it shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than ten years or life imprisonment, and shall be fined or confiscated.
There are so many old Lai, and they are particularly arrogant. I think there are certain reasons for the imperfection of the law. Because our country's law imposes relatively low penalties for debts, and the debt has a maximum time limit of 20 years. After this period, the law will no longer be protected. This also gives Lao Lai some arrogant reasons.

Value Pack

Value Pack,Color Sleeve Value Packing,Silicone Stretch Lids

Guangdong DK Houseware Co., Limited , https://www.dkhouseware.com

Posted on